Whooping cough! How to respond to fatally-flawed papers? An example, in a setting where the fatal flaw is subtle, involving a confounding of time and cohort effects

Matthieu Domenech de Cellès writes: I am a research group leader in infectious disease epidemiology at the Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology in Berlin. I read your recent post on how to respond to fatally flawed papers. Here is … Continue reading → …